7 Best Practices for Writing Interrupt Service Routines

7 Best Practices for Writing Interrupt Service Routines


Embedded systems rely on efficient handling of external events to react to changing conditions and perform real-time tasks. Interrupt Service Routines (ISRs) are crucial for achieving this. An ISR is a function that the processor executes upon receiving an interrupt signal, temporarily pausing the main program’s execution. Well-written ISRs are important for maintaining system responsiveness, data integrity, and overall program stability.

An ISR is a dedicated service routine that handles a specific interrupt source. When an interrupt occurs, the processor saves the current program state, jumps to the corresponding ISR, executes the ISR code, and then restores the saved state before resuming the main program.

The significance of well-written ISRs lies in their management of time-sensitive events. A slow or inefficient ISR can significantly impact system performance. Furthermore, improper data handling within the ISR can lead to race conditions and data corruption, causing unpredictable system behavior. Here are some of the best practices for writing Interrupt Service Routines:

1. Keep it Short and Fast

The primary function of an ISR is to acknowledge the interrupt and perform the minimal actions necessary to prepare for further processing. The ISR’s execution time should be minimized to limit disruption to the main program flow. This principle prioritizes responsiveness to the interrupting event while ensuring the main program can resume its tasks promptly.

Here’s how to achieve this:

  • Prioritize tasks: Identify the most critical actions required to handle the interrupt. Defer non-critical operations, such as complex calculations or data processing, to the main program.
  • Minimize processing: Limit the ISR’s code to tasks like clearing interrupt flags, updating status variables, or triggering a flag for the main program to handle later.

2. Minimize Context Switching

Function calls within an ISR introduce significant overhead due to context switching, where the processor saves and restores the current state. This can significantly slow down ISR execution.

  • Avoid function calls: Instead, prioritize inline functions or simple code blocks within the ISR itself.
  • Use flags or semaphores: If complex processing is necessary, set a flag or semaphore within the ISR to notify the main program. The main program can then handle the complex tasks without the constraints of the ISR execution time.

When dealing with shared data between the ISR and the main program, ensuring data integrity is paramount.

3. Protect Shared Data

Critical sections of code that access shared data require protection mechanisms to prevent race conditions and data corruption. Race conditions occur when multiple parts of the program (ISR and main program) try to access and modify the same data simultaneously, leading to unpredictable outcomes.

Here are some methods to employ:

  • Atomic operations: Utilize hardware-provided atomic operations like indivisible read-modify-write instructions for accessing critical data.
  • Interrupt nesting: If atomic operations are unavailable, consider disabling interrupts temporarily to create a critical section within the ISR. However, use this approach cautiously to avoid ISR latency issues.

4. Synchronize with Other Threads

In multi-threaded systems, additional considerations are necessary to ensure safe access to shared data between the ISR and multiple threads.

  • Mutexes and semaphores: Implement synchronization primitives like mutexes or semaphores to control access to shared resources. These mechanisms ensure only one thread (ISR or main program thread) can access the critical section at a time.

5. Handle Unexpected Events

  • Invalid interrupt sources: Include checks within the ISR to validate the interrupt source. This helps identify potential hardware or software errors that might be causing spurious interrupts.
  • Interrupt priority: If multiple interrupt sources exist, consider using interrupt priority to ensure higher-priority events get handled first, even if a lower-priority interrupt occurs during its execution.

6. Design for Debuggability

Debuggability is essential for identifying and resolving issues within ISRs.

  • Clear variable names and comments: Use descriptive variable names and comments to explain the purpose of the ISR code. This aids understanding and simplifies debugging.
  • Assertions and error logging: Employ assertions or error logging mechanisms to detect and record unexpected behavior within the ISR. This allows for easier identification and troubleshooting of potential problems.

7. Write Efficient and Maintainable Code

Well-written ISRs not only prioritize functionality but also adhere to coding standards and best practices to promote readability, maintainability, and potential optimization opportunities. Here are some key considerations:

  • Coding Standards: Follow established coding standards for your development environment. This ensures consistent use of naming conventions, indentation, and commenting styles, making the ISR code easier to understand for yourself and others. Consistent code improves maintainability in the long run.
  • Compiler Optimizations: Compiler optimizations can improve code performance, but use them cautiously within ISRs. Aggressive optimizations might introduce unintended side effects, potentially altering the timing behavior of the ISR in critical ways. Here’s a balanced approach:
  1. Enable optimizations selectively: If your compiler offers options to control the level of optimization within a specific function, enable optimizations for the ISR but avoid the most aggressive settings.
  2. Profile and measure: If performance is a major concern, profile your ISR execution time to identify bottlenecks. Then, experiment with specific compiler optimization flags to see if they provide measurable performance improvements without introducing timing issues.
  • Inline Functions: Consider marking critical functions called within the ISR as inline. This instructs the compiler to potentially replace the function call with the function’s body directly within the ISR, reducing overhead. However, use this judiciously as large inline functions can increase ISR size.

Additional Considerations:

  • Interrupt Latency: While keeping ISRs short is important, consider the minimum time required to handle the interrupt effectively. This ensures the system responds promptly to the interrupting event.
  • Hardware Specifics: Interrupt handling mechanisms and capabilities can vary depending on the specific microcontroller or processor being used. Refer to the relevant hardware documentation for details on interrupt handling features and limitations.

Wrapping Up

Remember to adhere to the best practices for writing Interrupt Service Routines (ISRs) mentioned above. This will enable you to write efficient and reliable ISRs that enhance the performance, reliability, and maintainability of your embedded system. By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your ISRs handle external events effectively without compromising the overall system’s responsiveness and stability. Well-written ISRs are pivotal for the proper functioning of embedded systems.

Hire the Best Engineers with RunTime

At RunTime, we are dedicated to helping you find the best Engineering talent for your recruitment needs. Our team consists of engineers-turned-recruiters with an extensive network and a focus on quality. By partnering with us, you will have access to great engineering talent that drives innovation and excellence in your projects.

Discover how RunTime has helped 423+ tech companies find highly qualified and talented engineers to enhance their team’s capabilities and achieve strategic goals.

On the other hand, if you’re a control systems engineer looking for new opportunities, RunTime Recruitment’s job site is the perfect place to find job vacancies.

Recruiting Services