How to Elevate Code Quality with Static Code Analysis

In embedded systems, where even minor code imperfections can translate to device malfunctions, fatalities, and financial losses, achieving the highest possible code quality is paramount. Traditional debugging techniques, while essential, often identify issues late in the development cycle, leading to costly rework and potential safety risks. Static code analysis (SCA) emerges as a powerful tool in our arsenal, offering a proactive approach to improve code quality from the get-go.

What is Static Code Analysis (SCA)?

Unlike dynamic testing, which involves executing the code and observing its behavior under various conditions, SCA examines the code itself, without execution. It leverages a rule-based engine and pattern recognition techniques to identify potential defects, vulnerabilities, and coding standard violations. Imagine a meticulous code auditor meticulously reviewing your work, line by line, searching for logic flaws, inefficiencies, and areas for improvement. That’s the essence of SCA.

SCA Engine and Capabilities

At its core, an SCA tool operates on an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST), a hierarchical representation of the code structure. The SCA engine traverses this AST, applying a set of predefined rules that target specific coding constructs, potential error patterns, and adherence to coding standards. These rules can encompass various aspects, including:

• Data flow analysis: Identifying potential issues like use-before-initialization, dangling pointers, and null pointer dereferences.
• Control flow analysis: Detecting unreachable code sections, infinite loops, and switch statement inconsistencies.
• Type checking: Verifying type compatibility of variables and expressions, preventing type mismatches that can lead to runtime errors.
• Code complexity analysis: Highlighting overly complex code sections that might be difficult to understand and maintain.
• Memory management analysis: Finding potential memory leaks, uninitialized variables, and buffer overflows, critical for resource-constrained embedded systems.

Benefits of SCA for Embedded Systems

For embedded systems engineers, SCA offers a multitude of benefits that directly translate to safer, more reliable, and higher-performing devices:

• Early Bug Detection: SCA can pinpoint issues like syntax errors, undefined behavior constructs, and potential logic flaws early in the development process. This significantly reduces the time and cost associated with fixing bugs later in the cycle, when they can be more difficult to isolate and can have cascading effects on other parts of the codebase.
• Improved Code Maintainability: By identifying poor coding practices like variable shadowing, unused variables, and overly complex functions, SCA promotes cleaner, more readable code. This not only improves the maintainability of your own code but also makes it easier for future developers, reducing the likelihood of introducing regressions during maintenance cycles.
• Enhanced Code Consistency: SCA can be configured to enforce adherence to specific coding standards, such as MISRA C, C++ Core Guidelines, or project-specific coding conventions. This ensures consistency across the codebase, reducing the cognitive load on developers and improving overall code quality. Standardized code is easier to review, test, and ultimately leads to fewer errors.
• Security Vulnerability Detection: Modern SCA tools can identify potential security vulnerabilities in your code, such as buffer overflows, integer overflows, and format string vulnerabilities. This is especially critical in today’s connected world, where embedded systems are increasingly exposed to security threats from malicious actors. Early detection and mitigation of these vulnerabilities are crucial for protecting the integrity and functionality of embedded devices.

How to Use SCA Effectively

To reap the full benefits of SCA, here’s a breakdown of effective implementation strategies:

• Choosing an SCA Tool: The SCA landscape offers a variety of open-source and commercial tools, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Consider factors like:
  • Language support: Ensure the tool supports the programming languages used in your project (C, C++, Assembly etc.).
  • Desired features: Evaluate features like rule customization, integration capabilities with your development environment (IDEs, CI/CD pipelines), and reporting functionalities.
  • Project size and complexity: Open-source options like CPPcheck and Flawfinder might be suitable for smaller projects, while commercial offerings like Coverity and Helix QAC provide advanced capabilities and scalability for larger, more complex codebases.
• Integrating SCA into the Development Workflow: Embed SCA into your continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline. This allows for automated code analysis with every build or code commit, providing immediate feedback to developers. Additionally, integrate SCA findings into code review processes to ensure a comprehensive code quality assessment. SCA reports can be seamlessly integrated into popular code review tools like Gerrit or GitLab.
• Prioritizing and Addressing SCA Findings: SCA reports can generate a large number of findings. It’s crucial to prioritize these findings based on severity (critical, high, medium, low, confidence (confirmed, suspected), and potential impact on the code’s functionality and safety. Utilize your experience and understanding of the codebase to differentiate between critical issues and false positives, which may arise due to limitations of the SCA tool or project-specific coding styles. Here are some techniques for effective prioritization:
  • Focus on high-risk areas: Prioritize findings related to safety-critical code sections, security vulnerabilities, and resource management (memory leaks, buffer overflows).
  • Analyze code context: Evaluate the potential impact of the finding on the surrounding code and overall system behavior. A seemingly minor issue in a non-critical section might be less concerning than a potential logic flaw in a core algorithm.
  • Leverage code history: Analyze if similar findings have surfaced in the past and how they were addressed. This can help identify recurring issues and potential root causes.
• False Positives and Code Tuning: SCA tools are powerful but not infallible. They might generate false positives due to:
  • Limitations in the tool’s ability to understand complex code constructs.
  • Project-specific coding styles or idioms that deviate from common practices.

To address false positives:

• Evaluate the root cause: Analyze the SCA report and the flagged code section to understand why the tool raised the finding.
• Suppress justifiable false positives: Most SCA tools allow for suppression of specific findings or entire categories of findings based on reasoning and justification. This helps to streamline future code reviews and focus on legitimate issues.
• Refine SCA rules (if applicable): Some advanced SCA tools allow for customization of rules. If false positives are systematic due to specific coding conventions, consider creating custom rules to avoid unnecessary warnings.

SCA Best Practices for Embedded Systems

Here are some best practices to maximize the effectiveness of SCA in your embedded systems projects:

• Define Custom Rules: Many SCA tools allow for the creation of custom rules. Leverage this feature to target specific concerns in embedded systems development, such as:
  • Resource usage optimization: Define custom rules to identify code sections with excessive function call nesting or complex algorithms that might consume excessive processing power or memory.
  • Bit manipulation analysis: Create custom rules to detect potential errors in bit-level operations, which are common in resource-constrained embedded systems.
  • MISRA C/C++ compliance checks: If your project adheres to MISRA coding standards, leverage SCA tools that offer built-in MISRA checks or enable the creation of custom rules to enforce specific MISRA guidelines.
• Integrate with Other Code Quality Tools: SCA is a powerful tool, but it’s not the only one in your belt. Combine SCA with linters and code formatters to create a comprehensive code quality toolkit. Each tool tackles different aspects of code quality:
  • Linters: Focus on enforcing coding style conventions and identifying potential syntax errors.
  • Code formatters: Ensure consistent code formatting, improving readability and maintainability.
  • SCA: Analyzes code logic, structure, and potential runtime issues. By working together, these tools provide a holistic view of code quality.
• Project-Specific Configurations: Tailor your SCA configuration to your specific project requirements. This might involve:
  • Enabling or disabling certain rules based on the programming language used (C vs. C++).
  • Adjusting rule severities based on project risk tolerance and coding standards.
  • Integrating project-specific coding guidelines or conventions into the SCA rule set.

Conclusion

Static code analysis empowers embedded systems engineers to write cleaner, more reliable, and secure code. By incorporating SCA into your development workflow and following best practices, you can significantly elevate code quality, leading to safer, more robust embedded systems. As the field of embedded systems continues to evolve, with increasing code complexity and security concerns, SCA will undoubtedly play an increasingly crucial role in ensuring the quality and integrity of our code.

Related Articles:

• How to Streamline Your Software Development Workflow
• What is Version Control and Why it Matters?
• Infrastructure as Code: Best Practices in Embedded Systems

Hire the Best Engineers with RunTime

At RunTime, we are dedicated to helping you find the best Engineering talent for your recruitment needs. Our team consists of engineers-turned-recruiters with an extensive network and a focus on quality. By partnering with us, you will have access to great engineering talent that drives innovation and excellence in your projects.

Discover how RunTime has helped 423+ tech companies find highly qualified and talented engineers to enhance their team’s capabilities and achieve strategic goals.

On the other hand, if you’re a control systems engineer looking for new opportunities, RunTime Recruitment’s job site is the perfect place to find job vacancies.